A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
The Cornell Law School website offers a range of information on legal topics, such as citation of case regulation, as well as offers a video tutorial on case citation.
Due to recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been doable under the previous Model on the regulation.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of someday while in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness of the alleged occurrence as well as prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to become the real brothers in the deceased but they did not react in any way towards the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a lot of situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is often a weak variety of evidence which could possibly be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is also counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to existence of some light within the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners collectively on a motorcycle at four.
This unfortunate ambiguity results from the regulation regarding murder and manslaughter to get repugnant with Just about every other.
record from the department there is no record offered whatsoever regarding promotion of the petitioner(Promotion)
This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been with the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally seem, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion could possibly be deemed, however, we are clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy issue into the approval with the competent authority. Read more
six. Mere involvement in the heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled with the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, considering that then he is driving the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is not any more essential for further investigation, therefore, his steady incarceration would not provide any beneficial purpose at this stage.
Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be matter to your most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
VI) The petitioner is powering the bars considering that arrest, investigation in the case is complete, he is no more necessary for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him at the rear of the bars before summary of trial will serve no practical purpose.
The scrupulous reader might have noticed some thing over: a flaw. Past the first 7 words, the definition focuses over the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two basic elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
In order to prove murder, there needs to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
A coalition of residents sent read more a letter of petition to the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Enhancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) with the Pakistan Constitution provides authentic jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
From the United States, individuals are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in both civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their personal can remember just one rule of thumb when it relates to referring to case legislation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you can, leading the court, not only towards the case, but into the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.